Welcome to our collection of articles dedicated to green politics. As our world grapples with pressing environmental and societal challenges, the green political movement emerges as a beacon of change.
These articles explore core areas of green politics such as: degrowth, demilitarization, union and worker rights, and anti-capitalism.
Discover the nuances of degrowth as we examine strategies to reshape economies, moving away from military and capitalist growth models toward a more balanced, regenerative approach. Explore the imperative of demilitarization, unraveling the environmental and social impacts of excessive military expenditures, and delving into proposals for redirecting resources towards constructive, peace-building endeavors. Anti-capitalism is a key theme, challenging the prevailing economic systems that prioritizes profit over people and the environment. Union and worker rights in politics is another key area. Our articles dissect the green political stance on restructuring economies to prioritize social justice, environmental sustainability, and community well-being.
This thought-provoking content analyzes the intersectionality of these principles, offering insights into how green politics seeks to create a world where ecological responsibility, demilitarization, and anti-capitalist values converge for the betterment of society and the planet.
We hope you enjoy these explorations of the progressive ideals of green politics, providing you with valuable perspectives, informed analyses, and potential solutions to the challenges we face. Stay engaged, informed, and inspired, and let’s pave the way toward a future guided by the principles of degrowth, demilitarization, and anti-capitalism.
The doctrine of “preemptive force” has transformed international politics into a dangerous arena where suspicion becomes justification for war. In this searing critique, Mir Adnan Aziz argues that the normalization of preemption—seen in Iraq, Libya and now the widening war in West Asia—has eroded international law and made diplomacy itself a perilous act. When negotiations can be weaponized and compliance offers no security, states are pushed toward militarization and nuclear deterrence. The greatest victims remain civilians, especially children, who bear the devastating human cost. Preemption, the author warns, is not a path to security but a doctrine that fuels perpetual conflict and globalchaos.
The Education of Henry Adams Today Or The Murderous Empire At a time when the United States of America is revealing itself as an enemy of humanity, remembering those within the American cultural tradition who were critical of the path this country was taking—often foreseeing what was to come—can be of great importance in better understanding what we are experiencing today. And this understanding is fundamental to fueling resistance to the unprecedented destruction caused by the Empire. Henry Adams belonged to one of the most distinguished families in the United States. He was the great-grandson and grandson […]
ICE raids in Colorado have sparked outrage after agents allegedly left behind “ace of spades” death cards—an eerie symbol once used by U.S. troops in Vietnam to mark their victims. Nick Turse draws a chilling parallel between past imperial violence and present-day immigration enforcement, exposing a culture of intimidation, impunity, and racialized fear. As reports of shootings, unlawful detentions, and suppression of observers mount, the article asks whether America’s “forever wars” have come home. This searing piece interrogates how militarized tactics abroad are reappearing within U.S. borders, targeting vulnerable communities under the guise of law enforcement.
From Gaza’s ruins to Cuba’s long siege, Canada projects an image of principled diplomacy—yet beneath the rhetoric lies a pattern of calibrated silence. This critique interrogates Ottawa’s “tactful” bystander posture, where carefully worded statements mask complicity in an unequal global order. Whether endorsing Israel’s “right to defend” or maintaining distance from transformative solidarities, Canada emerges less as peacekeeper than risk-averse spectator. In a world demanding moral clarity, this essay asks: is neutrality merely another name for consent, and diplomacy a language for disengagement amid enduring injustice?
Operation Lion’s Roar revives a familiar script: inflated threats, manufactured consent, and the shadow of regime change. Drawing chilling parallels with the 2003 Iraq invasion, this essay dissects how the United States and Israel deploy fear, selective intelligence, and moral posturing to justify renewed strikes on Iran. Claims of nuclear danger and imminent threats mask deeper geopolitical ambitions, while international law is sidelined. As targeted killings and destabilisation intensify, the risk of wider regional conflict grows. Beneath the rhetoric of security lies a troubling question: how many more wars will be sold on narratives that unravel only after devastation iscomplete?
