Daniel Tanuro argued that the energy transition would require an increase in fossil energy, and therefore an increase in emissions. So somewhere along the line, to balance the climate equation, we need to compensate for this by cutting production and transport. He suggested eliminating useless or harmful production, such as weapons production or advertising.
The government’s climate plans that have been adopted to date would put global warming at 3.2°C. But there won’t be any civilisation at 3.2°C, Tanuro said, as there won’t be enough food for everyone.